Accueil ACTUALITÉ Insécurité : L’Ukraine a plus besoin de Barkhane que le sahel

Insécurité : L’Ukraine a plus besoin de Barkhane que le sahel

637
0

Ceci est une opinion de Nestorine Sangaré.

𝘌𝘯 𝘫𝘢𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘳 2015, 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘭𝘢 𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘭’𝘈𝘮𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘶𝘳 𝘎𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘢 𝘰𝘣𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘶 𝘢𝘶 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘭’𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭’𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥’𝘶𝘯 𝘥𝘦́𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤̧𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘶 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘤 𝘔𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘭 𝘒𝘢𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰.

𝘗𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴, 𝘭𝘦 𝘗𝘳𝘦́𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘋𝘦́𝘭𝘦́𝘨𝘶𝘦́ 𝘢𝘶𝘹 𝘈𝘧𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘦́𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦̀𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘯’𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦́ 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦. 𝘋𝘦𝘶𝘹 𝘮𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘱𝘳𝘦̀𝘴 𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘦́𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘝𝘰𝘪𝘤𝘪 𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘭’𝘈𝘮𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘶𝘳 𝘓𝘶𝘤 𝘏𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘥𝘦, 𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘶𝘪-𝘭𝘢̀ 𝘮𝘦̂𝘮𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘢 𝘥𝘶 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘯 𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘦, 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭’𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘍𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘻 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦́𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘫𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦.

𝘜𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘳 𝘥’𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘶𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘦́𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥’𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦́𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘧𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘦𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦́𝘦 𝘥’𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘪𝘳𝘦. 𝘌𝘯 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘴 𝘥𝘶 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘯’𝘢𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘥’𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘱𝘦́𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘤 𝘭𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘺 𝘦𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘺𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦́𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴, 𝘪𝘭 𝘧𝘢𝘶𝘵 𝘴’𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦 𝘢̀ 𝘥𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘦́𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘪𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘷𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘴’𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘳. 𝘓’𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦́𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘦́𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦, 𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘷𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 𝘦𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘳 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘶𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘦, 𝘦𝘯 𝘴’𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘵 𝘮𝘦́𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘦́𝘦𝘴.

𝘐𝘭 𝘧𝘢𝘶𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘯𝘤 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦 𝘶𝘯 𝘳𝘦́𝘨𝘪𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘦́𝘮𝘰𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘦𝘵 𝘶𝘯 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘦́𝘭𝘶 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘯 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘶𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘦𝘵 𝘧𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘢̀ 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯, 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘥𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘥𝘦́𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥’𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘱𝘦́𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘤 𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘺𝘴.

𝘌𝘯 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘭’𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥 𝘥𝘦 1961, 𝘪𝘭 𝘺 𝘢 𝘤𝘦𝘶𝘹 𝘥𝘦 2015, 2018 𝘦𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘶𝘵-𝘦̂𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘶𝘪 𝘥𝘶 17 𝘥𝘦́𝘤𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦 2021 𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘭’𝘌𝘵𝘢𝘵 𝘔𝘢𝘫𝘰𝘳 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤̧𝘢𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘥𝘦́𝘣𝘢𝘳𝘲𝘶𝘦́ 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘦́𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘴 𝘢̀ 𝘒𝘰𝘴𝘺𝘢𝘮. 𝘋𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘦, 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘯’𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘳 𝘪𝘭 𝘢 𝘦́𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘦́ 𝘢𝘶 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭 𝘪𝘭 𝘢 𝘦́𝘵𝘦́ 𝘤𝘳𝘦́𝘦́, 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘯 𝘭’𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘶 𝘥𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦́𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦 2021.

𝘗𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘲𝘶𝘰𝘪 𝘤’𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘦𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘳, 𝘥𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦, 𝘤𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘥𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘹 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘴? 𝘓’𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘭’𝘜𝘬𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘢̀ 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘩𝘢𝘪𝘵 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘪𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘢 𝘴𝘦́𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦́ 𝘦𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘯𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘳 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘪𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘯 𝘻𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘶𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘴.

𝘓𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘶𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘶 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘢 𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘪𝘵 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘳 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘤 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘥𝘶 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘰𝘱𝘦́𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦. 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘶𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦́𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘭𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘪𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘢 𝘍𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘖𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘶𝘹 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘢𝘳 𝘛𝘢𝘬𝘶𝘣𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭’𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘥𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘰𝘪𝘳𝘦.

𝘊’𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘦𝘵 𝘥’𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘶𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘤𝘰𝘩𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘤 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴. 𝘓𝘦𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘶𝘹 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘦́𝘵𝘦́ 𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘯 𝘐𝘳𝘢𝘬, 𝘦𝘯 𝘚𝘺𝘳𝘪𝘦, 𝘦𝘯 𝘈𝘧𝘨𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘵 𝘦𝘯 𝘓𝘺𝘣𝘪𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘦. 𝘗𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘵, 𝘪𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘦́ 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘦𝘵 𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘰𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘦́𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘦 𝘲𝘶’𝘪𝘭𝘴 𝘦́𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘦́𝘴 𝘦́𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘳. 𝘕𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘯𝘦 𝘷𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦̀𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘻 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴.

𝘚𝘪 𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘥𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘴 𝘥𝘶 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘲𝘶𝘪 𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘦́𝘵𝘦́ 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘦𝘯 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘰̂𝘵 𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘥, 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘳𝘦́𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘳 𝘢̀ 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘪𝘳 𝘭’𝘢𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘦́𝘦𝘴.

𝘈𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘭’𝘜𝘬𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘭𝘶𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦́𝘦𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘭𝘦 𝘉𝘶𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘢 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘰 𝘰𝘶 𝘭𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘩𝘦𝘭.

𝘕𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘦́

 Save as Image

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here